Unibet vs Ladbrokes: Head-to-Head Comparison
On the numbers we hold, these two are close. Unibet edges the odds and live betting scores; Ladbrokes edges licence safety and racing depth. Both hold a Northern Territory Racing Commission (NTRC) licence, both process PayID and card deposits from a $10 minimum, and both quote withdrawal windows of 0–24 hours.
If you back racing heavily and want the deepest event coverage, Ladbrokes is the pick. If you weight odds value and live/in-play markets a touch higher, Unibet has the marginal advantage in our data. This page breaks down every category with the ratings and sampled-odds figures we hold, so you can match the bookie to how you actually bet.
| Unibet | Ladbrokes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 8.5 | 8.4 |
| Licence | NTRC ✓ | NTRC ✓ |
| Best price share | 66% | 38% |
| Avg. margin | 6.1% | 6.8% |
| Min deposit | 10 | 10 |
| Withdrawal time | 0–24h | 0–24h |
| Payments | PayID, Visa | PayID, Visa, Mastercard |
| Apps | iOS/Android | iOS/Android |
| Find My Best Betting Site | Find My Best Betting Site |
Odds comparison
Odds comparison: both score well in our rating (7.8/10 and 7.6/10) — this one won't decide it.
Markets & coverage
Markets & coverage: both score well in our rating (8.4/10 and 8.3/10) — this one won't decide it.
Live betting
Live betting: both score well in our rating (8.4/10 and 8.1/10) — this one won't decide it.
Payments & payouts
Payments & payouts: both score well in our rating (8.5/10 and 8.3/10) — this one won't decide it.
Withdrawal time
Withdrawal time: both score well in our rating (8.3/10 and 8.1/10) — this one won't decide it.
App & mobile
App & mobile: both score well in our rating (8.4/10 and 8.4/10) — this one won't decide it.
Bet Builder
Bet Builder: both score well in our rating (7.9/10 and 7.8/10) — this one won't decide it.
Licence & safety
Licence & safety: both score well in our rating (9.2/10 and 9.0/10) — this one won't decide it.
Unibet — Pros / Cons
- ✓ Great local payment support
- ✓ Polished, easy app
- ✓ Licensed and regulated locally
- ✗ Odds are competitive but not always the best
Ladbrokes — Pros / Cons
- ✓ Polished, easy app
- ✓ Great local payment support
- ✓ Licensed and regulated locally
- ✗ Odds are competitive but not always the best
Quick verdict: which one for which punter
Choose Unibet if odds value and in-play matter most. It scores 7.8 for odds against Ladbrokes' 7.6, and returned the best price on 55.97% of the 243 markets we sampled — slightly ahead of Ladbrokes' 54.65% best-price share across 258 markets. Its live capability (8.4) and features (8.4) also nose in front.
Choose Ladbrokes if racing and safety top your list. Founded in 1886, it carries our highest licence safety score in this pair at 9.2 (Unibet sits at 9.0) and leads on sports depth (8.5 vs 8.4) and market coverage (8.4 vs 8.3).
Both are genuinely close, so for many punters the decider is payments: Unibet lists PayID and Visa, while Ladbrokes lists PayID, Visa and Mastercard. If you fund with a Mastercard, that alone may settle it.
Side-by-side comparison
The table pulls together the ratings and factual data we hold for both bookmakers. Ratings are on a 0–10 scale; margin and best-price figures come from our sampled odds sets.
| Category | Unibet | Ladbrokes | |---|---|---| | Founded | 1997 | 1886 | | Regulator | NTRC | NTRC | | Odds rating | 7.8 | 7.6 | | Avg margin (sampled) | 5.84% | 5.82% | | Best-price share | 55.97% (243) | 54.65% (258) | | Market coverage | 8.3 | 8.4 | | Sports depth | 8.4 | 8.5 | | Live capability | 8.4 | 8.1 | | Bet Builder | 7.9 | 7.8 | | Payments rating | 8.5 | 8.3 | | Withdrawals rating | 8.3 | 8.1 | | Withdrawal time | 0–24h | 0–24h | | App rating | 8.4 | 8.4 | | Features | 8.4 | 8.2 | | Support | 8.1 | 8.0 | | Licence safety | 9.0 | 9.2 | | Min deposit | $10 | $10 | | Payments | PayID, Visa | PayID, Visa, Mastercard |
Note the margins are near-identical (5.84% Unibet, 5.82% Ladbrokes), so line value comes down to individual markets rather than one bookie being systematically sharper.
Odds and value
This is Unibet's category, but only just. Across our samples it delivered the top price on roughly 56% of markets versus Ladbrokes' 55%, and its 7.8 odds rating sits two-tenths above Ladbrokes' 7.6.
The average margins tell a different story. At 5.84% (Unibet) and 5.82% (Ladbrokes), overrounds are effectively level. What that means in practice: neither is consistently sharper across the board, so serious value hunters should hold accounts with both and take whichever posts the better line on the day.
If you want to compare live prices before you commit, our betting odds Australia pages and market movers tracker show where the money is going.
Sports and racing coverage
Ladbrokes carries the heritage in racing and the higher depth scores — sports depth 8.5 and market coverage 8.4, both a fraction above Unibet's 8.4 and 8.3. For punters who live on Horse Racing form, Ladbrokes is the natural first account.
Both cover the codes Australian punters bet most: AFL (Aussie Rules), NRL (Rugby League), Big Bash and Test cricket, ATP and WTA tennis, plus football across the A-League, Premier League and Champions League and basketball including the NBA. On the football and basketball side, coverage between the two is essentially matched.
Unibet's edge shows in-play: its live capability score of 8.4 beats Ladbrokes' 8.1, which matters if you bet during matches rather than pre-game.
Bet Builder, cash out and live streaming
Both bookmakers list Live Betting, Cash Out, Bet Builder and Live Streaming in their feature sets, so on functionality there is no gap to speak of.
Where they separate is polish. Unibet rates 7.9 for Bet Builder against Ladbrokes' 7.8, and 8.4 for overall features versus 8.2. Those are small margins — both let you combine legs on an AFL or NRL match, cash out a running multi, and stream selected events. If you build same-game multis regularly, Unibet is marginally ahead on our scoring, but you won't find either lacking a core feature.
Compare feature availability across the market on our Cash Out and Live Betting pages.
Payments and withdrawals
Both accept PayID and Visa with a $10 minimum deposit, and both quote withdrawal windows of 0–24 hours. The practical difference is card range: Ladbrokes also lists Mastercard, while Unibet's stated methods are PayID and Visa.
On our ratings, Unibet leads slightly for payments (8.5 vs 8.3) and withdrawals (8.3 vs 8.1) — a reflection of the process scoring rather than any promise of instant cashouts. Both operators quote the same 0–24 hour band, so treat same-day withdrawals as possible but not guaranteed.
PayID is the fastest local option at both and is our recommended default for AU punters who want account-to-account speed. See PayID betting sites for the wider list, or Mastercard betting sites if that card is your preference — a point in Ladbrokes' favour.
Apps and mobile
It's a dead heat here: both score 8.4 for their apps and both offer native iOS and Android downloads. Whichever you choose, you'll get full mobile betting, live in-play and cash out from your phone.
Since the apps are level on our data, base the decision on the categories that differ — odds and in-play for Unibet, racing depth and Mastercard support for Ladbrokes. For a broader shortlist, see our betting apps Australia rankings.
Licensing, safety and support
Both hold a Northern Territory Racing Commission (NTRC) licence, which is the standard corporate-bookmaker licence recognised for Australian punters. Wagering here is overseen by state and territory racing and wagering authorities, and the minimum age to bet is 18.
Ladbrokes carries the higher licence safety score in this pair at 9.2, with Unibet at 9.0 — both strong, and the gap is narrow. Ladbrokes' long operating history (since 1886) contributes to that score. Support is near-level, with Unibet at 8.1 and Ladbrokes at 8.0.
We verify licensing against the operator and regulator details we hold; we don't make first-hand claims about accounts or payouts. For the full picture, see our Ladbrokes review and Unibet review, or the list of legal betting sites Australia.
The bottom line
Pick Unibet if you value odds and in-play the most — it leads on odds rating (7.8), best-price share, live capability (8.4) and both payment and withdrawal scores.
Pick Ladbrokes if racing depth, Mastercard funding and the highest licence safety score (9.2) are your priorities.
Many AU punters run both and shop the line, since margins are effectively identical (5.84% vs 5.82%). If you only want one, let your main sport and preferred card make the call.
FAQ
Is Unibet or Ladbrokes better for odds?
On our sampled data Unibet has the slight edge: an odds rating of 7.8 versus 7.6, and the best price on about 56% of markets against Ladbrokes' 55%. But average margins are nearly identical (5.84% vs 5.82%), so the difference is small and varies market to market.
Do both take PayID?
Yes. Both Unibet and Ladbrokes list PayID, plus Visa. Ladbrokes also lists Mastercard, while Unibet's stated card option is Visa. Both have a $10 minimum deposit.
How fast are withdrawals at Unibet and Ladbrokes?
Both quote a withdrawal window of 0–24 hours. Unibet rates marginally higher on our withdrawals score (8.3 vs 8.1), but same-day payouts are possible rather than guaranteed at either.
Are Unibet and Ladbrokes licensed in Australia?
Yes. Both hold a Northern Territory Racing Commission (NTRC) licence. Wagering is overseen by state and territory racing and wagering authorities, and the legal betting age is 18. Ladbrokes scores 9.2 for licence safety and Unibet 9.0.
Which app is better?
The apps are level on our data — both score 8.4 and both offer iOS and Android downloads with live betting and cash out. Since they're tied, decide on odds, racing depth or payment method instead.
Which is better for horse racing?
Ladbrokes. It leads on sports depth (8.5) and market coverage (8.4), and its long history in racing supports its higher licence safety score. Unibet is close behind but Ladbrokes is the stronger racing account in this pair.